Shum v Nambakhsh

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Order

Ordered by Richard Ferriss,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: June 13, 2022
Unit ***, 70 Temperance St, Toronto, ON M5H0B1
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

-$769

to Tenant

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

N6 notice of termination
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Shum v Nambakhsh, 2022 CanLII 138725

File Number: LTB-L-001791-21

Timeline

Application Date

Dec 2021

6 months

Hearing Date

Jun 2022

7 days

Order Date

Jun 13, 2022

11 days

Tenancy End Date

Jun 2022

Decision

The tenancy is terminated effective June 24, 2022. The Tenant must pay the Landlord $705.05 for compensation from June 1 to June 13, 2022, and $186.00 for the application fee. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,650.00 for the rent deposit and $10.58 for interest on the deposit. The Landlord owes the Tenant a net amount of $769.33 as of the date of the order.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the Tenant or another occupant of the rental unit has committed an illegal act or has carried out, or permitted someone to carry out an illegal trade, business or occupation in the rental unit or the residential complex.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord and ES found a person using the rental unit as a short-term rental on November 28, 2021
  • Landlord gave Tenant an N6 notice of termination on December 13, 2021, deemed served on December 18, 2021
  • Landlord is entitled to compensation for the period June 1, 2022 to June 13, 2022
  • Landlord is entitled to reimbursement of $186.00 for filing the application
  • Landlord is holding a rent deposit of $1,650.00 and has not paid interest on the deposit
  • Landlord owes Tenant $769.33 as of the date of the order
  • SS's testimony corroborated the testimony of the Landlord and ES regarding the short-term rental incidents
  • Tenant has paid compensation for use of the rental unit up to May 31, 2022
  • Tenant was in possession of the rental unit on the date the application was filed
  • Termination of the tenancy is warranted as the illegal act has the potential to affect the character of the residential complex
  • Use of the rental unit as a short-term rental is an illegal act contrary to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 547
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant claimed that the Landlord was conspiring with other individuals to evict him from the rental unit so that the unit could be used for short-term rentals, and that he was paying a low rent and the Landlord was trying to evict him so she could make more money.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant denied using the rental unit for short-term rentals and alleged that the Landlord staged the incident on November 28, 2021.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Lawful Rent

$1,650

Application Fee

$186

Rent Deposit

$1,650

Deposit Interest

$11

Ordered Amount

-$769 (to Tenant)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Dunsmure Developments Ltd. v Kearnes, Geroux

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 22, 2025
Hamilton

Landlord wins case to terminate tenancy of superintendent's premises in Hamilton after employment ends, with 1-month delay for tenant.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionModerate

1762405 Ontario Ltd. v Hood

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 16, 2025
Hamilton

Landlord awarded eviction and over $4,800 in arrears after tenant fails to pay rent as ordered by LTB.

ContentionHigh

Chen and Wang v Lopez

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 9, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto landlords win eviction case against tenant owing $25,333 in rent arrears.

ContentionModerate

Mclean v Latchford

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 6, 2025
Brighton
Review Order

Brighton tenants face eviction for non-payment and interference, owe $6,194 to landlord.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Permitted
ContentionModerate

Dunsmure Developments Ltd. v Kearnes, Geroux

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 22, 2025
Hamilton

Landlord wins case to terminate tenancy of superintendent's premises in Hamilton after employment ends, with 1-month delay for tenant.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionModerate

1762405 Ontario Ltd. v Hood

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 16, 2025
Hamilton

Landlord awarded eviction and over $4,800 in arrears after tenant fails to pay rent as ordered by LTB.

ContentionHigh

Chen and Wang v Lopez

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 9, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto landlords win eviction case against tenant owing $25,333 in rent arrears.

ContentionModerate

Mclean v Latchford

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
May 6, 2025
Brighton
Review Order

Brighton tenants face eviction for non-payment and interference, owe $6,194 to landlord.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Permitted
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform