Landlords and Tenant Reach Agreement in Thornhill Rental Dispute: Shnet v Litwack 2024
Landlords and Tenant reach agreement in Thornhill rental dispute, Tenant to pay $186 application fee
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 305 Brownridge Dr, Thornhill, ON L4J5W7
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed to Landlord
$186
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Mar 2023
Tenancy End Date
Feb 2024
Hearing Date
Mar 2024
Order Date
Apr 12, 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to substantial interference with the Landlords' reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest, and for wilful or negligent damage to the premises. Landlords also applied for an order requiring Tenant to pay the Landlords' reasonable out-of-pocket costs to repair or replace the undue damage, and to pay the Landlords' reasonable out-of-pocket expenses resulting from the Tenant's conduct that substantially interfered with the Landlords' reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex or another lawful right, privilege, or interest.
Determinations
- Tenant was in possession on application date
- Tenant vacated on 2024-02-04
- Only outstanding amount is $186 for application filing fee
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated as of February 4, 2024, the move-out date by the Tenant. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord $186.00 for the cost of filing the application by April 15, 2024. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount by the due date, the Tenant will start to owe interest at 7.00% annually on the outstanding balance.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
3
Landlord Favorable
0.0%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
100.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$186 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.