Q.L v C.A.B.K.M
Last updated: July 30, 2024
Order
Ordered by ,Tribunals Ontario under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Ordered Amount
$250
to Landlord
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: Q.L v C.A.B.K.M, 2018 CanLII 120856
File Number: TSL-94316-18
Timeline
Hearing Date
May 2018
Order Date
Jun 1, 2018
Tenancy End Date
Jun 2018
Decision
The tenancy is terminated effective June 12, 2018. The Tenant must pay $75.00 for use of the unit from May 1 to May 31, 2018, $83.34 per day from June 1, 2018 until move-out, and $175.00 for the application filing fee. If the unit is not vacated by June 12, 2018, the Landlord may file for eviction enforcement starting June 13, 2018.
Dispute
Landlord filed an L2 application to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant based on two N5 Notices. The first N5 Notice alleged failure to pay utility bill, damage to fire-rated door and lock, loud music, changing bedroom lock, and having too many occupants. The second N5 Notice alleged refusal of entry for fire safety inspection.
Determinations
- Tenancy began November 2016, currently month-to-month
- Landlord filed L2 application based on two N5 Notices
- Rent deposit of $2,490.00 held by Landlord
- Current rent is $2,534.82 per month
- First N5 Notice served December 7, 2017
- Second N5 Notice alleged refusal of entry on March 21, 2018
- Tenant failed to pay utility bill on December 1, 2017
- Tenant refused entry for fire safety inspection after 24-hour notice
Landlord's Arguments
Arguments
Landlord argued that Tenant's actions substantially interfered with Landlord's lawful rights, privileges, and interests.
Actions and Evidence
Landlord provided 24-hour notice for entry to conduct fire safety inspection.
Tenant's Arguments
Actions and Evidence
Tenant failed to pay $50 utility bill on December 1, 2017. Tenant refused entry for fire safety inspection on March 21, 2018, after 24-hour notice was given.
Need assistance from an expert?
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$2,535
Application Fee
$175
Rent Deposit
$2,490
Other Amount
$75
Compensation for use of unit from May 1 to May 31, 2018
Ordered Amount
$250 (to Landlord)
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
Dunsmure Developments Ltd. v Kearnes, Geroux
Landlord wins case to terminate tenancy of superintendent's premises in Hamilton after employment ends, with 1-month delay for tenant.
Landlord awarded eviction and over $4,800 in arrears after tenant fails to pay rent as ordered by LTB.
Chen and Wang v Lopez
Toronto landlords win eviction case against tenant owing $25,333 in rent arrears.
Mclean v Latchford
Brighton tenants face eviction for non-payment and interference, owe $6,194 to landlord.
Dunsmure Developments Ltd. v Kearnes, Geroux
Landlord wins case to terminate tenancy of superintendent's premises in Hamilton after employment ends, with 1-month delay for tenant.
Landlord awarded eviction and over $4,800 in arrears after tenant fails to pay rent as ordered by LTB.
Chen and Wang v Lopez
Toronto landlords win eviction case against tenant owing $25,333 in rent arrears.
Mclean v Latchford
Brighton tenants face eviction for non-payment and interference, owe $6,194 to landlord.
Dunsmure Developments Ltd. v Kearnes, Geroux
Landlord wins case to terminate tenancy of superintendent's premises in Hamilton after employment ends, with 1-month delay for tenant.
Landlord awarded eviction and over $4,800 in arrears after tenant fails to pay rent as ordered by LTB.
Chen and Wang v Lopez
Toronto landlords win eviction case against tenant owing $25,333 in rent arrears.
Mclean v Latchford
Brighton tenants face eviction for non-payment and interference, owe $6,194 to landlord.
Dunsmure Developments Ltd. v Kearnes, Geroux
Landlord wins case to terminate tenancy of superintendent's premises in Hamilton after employment ends, with 1-month delay for tenant.
Landlord awarded eviction and over $4,800 in arrears after tenant fails to pay rent as ordered by LTB.
Chen and Wang v Lopez
Toronto landlords win eviction case against tenant owing $25,333 in rent arrears.
Mclean v Latchford
Brighton tenants face eviction for non-payment and interference, owe $6,194 to landlord.
Landlord and tenant reach consent order for $7,668.48 in rent arrears in Hamilton case.
Brampton tenants face eviction for non-payment of $39,000 in rent.
Kirkland Lake tenant faces eviction for non-payment of rent, owes $4,089.41 to landlord.
Cornwall tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $5,470 in rent, granted postponement to pursue additional benefits.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Landlord Entry Rights: Understanding 24-Hour Notice Requirements and Tenant Privacy in Ontario
A comprehensive analysis of Ontario's landlord entry laws reveals the strict 24-hour notice requirements, emergency exceptions, and substantial penalties for violations. Learn when landlords can legally enter rental units and how tenants can protect their privacy rights.
Landlord Harassment and Intimidation: Understanding Your Rights and Remedies in Ontario
An analysis of landlord harassment cases reveals common intimidation tactics, the legal definition of harassment under Ontario law, and the substantial remedies available to tenants facing persistent unwelcome conduct.
When Landlords Strike Back: Understanding Retaliation and Protecting Your Rights in Ontario
Discover how to recognize, document, and fight landlord retaliation in Ontario. Learn about legal protections, compensation awards, and strategies to enforce your tenant rights without fear of reprisal.