LTB order case study: Parkbridge Lifestyle Communities Inc v Tenants, 2021 CanLII 114601 (ON LTB)}
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 26, 2024
Case Summary
908 Lockhart Road, Innisfil, ON L9S3G7
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Order Date
Aug 5, 2021
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to permit rent increase above the guideline due to capital expenditures.
Determinations
- Landlord justified a rent increase above the guideline because of capital expenditures
- Landlord's amended application filed on February 4, 2020 accepted
- Maximum rent increase above the guideline because of capital expenditures is 0.30%
- Landlord agreed to remove certain capital expenditures from the claim
- Landlord served the Tenants with notice of the application and proceedings in accordance with the Board's instructions
Decision Summary
The Landlord may increase the rents charged by the percentage increases and within the time periods set out in Schedule 2. The percentage increase set out in Schedule 2 may be taken in addition to the annual guideline in effect on the increase date for the unit.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
333
Landlord Favorable
88.6%
Tenant Favorable
0.3%
Mutual Agreement
11.1%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.