Malleum Real Estate Management Corp v Marley

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Order

Ordered by Alex Brkic,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: February 17, 2022
*** Emerald Street North, Hamilton, ON L8L2X6
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Malleum Real Estate Management Corp v Marley, 2022 CanLII 108692 (ON LTB)

File Number: SOL-26684-21-SA

Timeline

Hearing Date

Feb 2022

8 days

Order Date

Feb 17, 2022

22 days

Tenancy End Date

Mar 2022

Decision

The Tenant's motion to set aside the previous order was denied. The stay of the previous order will be lifted on March 11, 2022, giving the Tenant one month to prepare to move out.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the tenant did not void by paying the arrears.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Tenant currently owes $7,557.10 in rent arrears
  • Tenant has only been making 'arrears' payments since the previous order, and has missed every monthly rent since July 2021
  • Tenant misunderstood the previous order and thought he only had to make one monthly payment
  • Tenant operates a moving company that has slowed down
  • Tenant owes 'back taxes' on the business
  • Tenant's December 2021 rent payment was returned NSF
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord's Agent requested the motion to set aside be denied and the stay lifted immediately.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord's Agent testified that the Tenant's December 2021 payment of $1,219.71 was returned NSF, and the Tenant has only been making 'arrears' payments since the previous order and has missed every monthly rent since July 2021.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant requested a couple of months to be able to move out, stating he has been a tenant for the past five years.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant testified that his payment on or about December 1, 2021 was made through the portal but due to e-payment issues, the payment was not successful.

Unlock Order Content

Procedural Errors

Tenant misunderstood the previous order and thought he only had to make one monthly payment.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

John v Manor Park Management

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB dismisses Ottawa tenants' claims that their landlord steered potential lease assignees to other vacant units.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

McConnell v Torbill Holdings Ltd.

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Picton

Tenant's maintenance application dismissed by LTB for being too vague and failing to provide details for over a year.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

John v Manor Park Management

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB dismisses Ottawa tenants' claims that their landlord steered potential lease assignees to other vacant units.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

McConnell v Torbill Holdings Ltd.

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Picton

Tenant's maintenance application dismissed by LTB for being too vague and failing to provide details for over a year.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform