Landlord and Tenant Reach Agreement for Possession - Kim Do v Nabeela Zafar
Landlord and tenants reach agreement for termination of tenancy and vacant possession of Toronto rental unit
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 55 Harbour Sq, Toronto, ON M5J2L1
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
May 2023
Order Date
May 11, 2023
Tenancy End Date
Jun 2023
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants because the Purchaser requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation.
Determinations
- Tenancy to terminate on or before June 28, 2023
- Landlord may file order with Sheriff for eviction if unit not vacated by June 28, 2023
- Landlord waives rent for April and May 2023
- Last month's rent deposit to be applied towards June 2023 rent
- Unused portion of last month's rent deposit and $1,000 moving compensation to be returned to Tenants upon vacant possession
- Landlord to provide Tenants with a reference letter upon request
- Parties to execute a mutual release
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenants will terminate on or before June 28, 2023. If the unit is not vacated by that date, the Landlord may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) for eviction. The Landlord waives the rent for April and May 2023, and the last month's rent deposit will be applied towards the June 2023 rent. Any unused portion of the deposit and $1,000 in moving compensation will be returned to the Tenants upon vacant possession. The Landlord will provide the Tenants with a reference letter upon request, and the parties will execute a mutual release.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
546
Landlord Favorable
92.1%
Tenant Favorable
2.9%
Mutual Agreement
5.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$2,388
Rent Deposit
$2,388
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.