Landlord Wins Eviction Case Against Persistent Late-Paying Tenant: Joydip v Meisenheimer 2024
Mississauga landlords successfully evict tenant for non-payment and persistent late payment of rent, awarded $3042
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 2393 Hargood Pl, Mississauga, ON L5M3G2
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$3,042
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Feb 2024
Hearing Date
May 2024
Order Date
Jun 3, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Jun 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent and persistent late payment of rent. The applications were filed after serving a valid N4 Notice, which the Tenant did not void by paying the arrears. The Tenant was still in possession of the rental unit on the hearing date.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenant still in possession on hearing date
- Lawful rent is $1,845 due on 1st of each month
- Tenant paid $3,690 since application filed
- Rent arrears owing to 2024-05-31 are $6,380
- Tenant persistently late in paying rent for 12 of 12 months
- Landlord incurred $186 in filing costs
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord $3,042.32, which includes rent arrears and the application filing fee, less the rent deposit. The Tenant shall also pay daily compensation of $60.66 from 2024-05-03 until the Tenant vacates the unit. If the full amount is not paid by 2024-06-14, the Tenant will owe interest and the Landlord may file the order for enforcement.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
546
Landlord Favorable
92.1%
Tenant Favorable
2.9%
Mutual Agreement
5.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,845
Rent Arrears
$6,380
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$1,800
Total Owing
$3,042 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.