J.S. v M.M.

Last updated: July 30, 2024

Order

Ordered by ,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: January 2, 2015
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Notices Sent

Notice of Termination
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: J.S. v M.M., 2015 CanLII 2903 (ON LTB)

File Number: TNL-62904-14-RV

Timeline

Hearing Date

Dec 2014

24 days

Order Date

Jan 2, 2015

29 days

Tenancy End Date

Jan 2015

Decision

The tenancy is terminated, and the Tenant must move out by January 31, 2015. The Tenant must pay the Landlord $2,341.14 for compensation for use of the unit and NSF cheque charges, less the rent deposit and interest. The Tenant must also pay the Landlord $42.74 per day for compensation for use of the unit from January 3, 2015 until the Tenant moves out. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount by January 31, 2015, she will start owing interest.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to wilful or negligent damage to the rental unit and because the Landlord did not consent to an assignment or sublet of the unit. The Tenant requested a review of the original order.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Tenant was reasonably unable to participate in original hearing
  • Unauthorized sublet or assignment portion of application dismissed
  • Tenant wilfully or negligently damaged Landlord's property
  • Landlord did not substantiate claimed damages
  • Tenancy could not be rehabilitated due to broken relationship
  • Tenant mostly responsible for broken relationship
  • Tenant given delay before moving out to minimize hardship to children
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Considerations

Landlord sought a restraining order against Tenant and delegated communications to his 18-year-old daughter, who no longer wishes to continue in this role

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Tenant kicked in the entrance door after locking herself out, and removed the thermostat cover on two occasions

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Tenant's conduct was part of a pattern of hostile behavior, including kicking in the entrance door and repeatedly removing the thermostat cover, which was highly disruptive to the Landlord

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Loading similar cases...
Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform