Hana v Boushehrian

Last updated: August 6, 2024

Order

Ordered by Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: May 2, 2024
Unit ***, 3200 William Coltson Avenue, Oakville, ON L6H7C2
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

$17,861

to Landlord

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionModerate

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Hana v Boushehrian, 2024 ONLTB 31339

File Number: LTB-L-097268-23

Timeline

Application Date

Dec 2023

4 months

Hearing Date

Apr 2024

9 days

Order Date

May 2, 2024

5 days

Tenancy End Date

May 2024

Decision

The tenancy is terminated effective May 7, 2024. The tenant is ordered to pay $17,861.00 to the landlords, representing rent arrears and filing fees, on or before May 7, 2024. If the tenant does not pay the full amount by May 7, 2024, the tenant will start to owe interest at 7.00% annually on the outstanding balance starting May 8, 2024.

Unlock Order Content

Landlord

Representative | Paralegal

Tenant

Dispute

Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the tenant did not void by paying the arrears.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlords served valid N4 Notice
  • Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
  • Tenant in possession on application date
  • Lawful rent due on 1st of each month
  • No payments made since application filed
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Tenant's Arguments

Need assistance from an expert?

Thirusenthuran Sivapatham

Thirusenthuran Sivapatham

Professional Paralegal Services

Scarborough

Sponsored

Financial Details

Rent Arrears

$17,861

Ordered Amount

$17,861 (to Landlord)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 20, 2025
Bancroft
Review Order

LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.

ContentionModerate

Li v Lincoln

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 20, 2025
Toronto

Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $8,050 in rent, ordered to pay $7,674.86.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 20, 2025
Bancroft
Review Order

LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.

ContentionModerate

Li v Lincoln

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 20, 2025
Toronto

Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $8,050 in rent, ordered to pay $7,674.86.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: