Landlord Withdraws Eviction Application After Error - Greater Sudbury Housing Corporation v Lavoie-Kingsbury
Landlord withdraws eviction application after filing error
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
Case Summary
1570 Briar Avenue, Sudbury, ON P3A4J1
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2021
Hearing Date
Feb 2022
Order Date
Feb 10, 2022
Dispute Summary
The Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants because they failed to meet a condition specified in the mediated settlement issued by the Board on September 25, 2018 with respect to application NOL-32942-18.
Determinations
- Landlord withdrew request to review order
- Landlord's Agents did not intentionally make the error
- Landlord's Agents made an error in filing the L4 application
- Tenants' request for $500 in legal fees declined
Case Study
The Landlord's Agents recognized they filed the L4 application in error, and they withdrew the request to review the order. The Tenants' Representative requested $500 in legal fees, but the Member declined to order the Landlord to pay costs, as it was an error on the Landlord's part due to their newness as property managers, and they addressed the issue promptly.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Procedural Errors
The Landlord's Agents filed the L4 application in error, but they recognized the mistake and withdrew the request to review the order.
Decision Summary
The Landlord's request to review the order was withdrawn, and the Board's file is closed.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
558
Landlord Favorable
92.3%
Tenant Favorable
3.9%
Mutual Agreement
3.8%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.