Landlord Wins Rent Increase Dispute: Fedhel v Butrous 2021
Mississauga landlord wins rent increase dispute, tenant ordered to pay $528 or face eviction
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 26, 2024
Case Summary
3285 Dragon Drive, Mississauga, ON L5B3G7
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$528
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Oct 2020
Hearing Date
Mar 2021
Order Date
Mar 29, 2021
Tenancy End Date
Apr 2021
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to their failure to meet a condition specified in a previous order issued by the Board. The Tenants requested a review of the order.
Determinations
- Landlord's L4 application was properly filed
- Parties had previously entered into mediated agreement
- Landlord lawfully increased rent by guideline amount
- Tenant agreed to pay increase to preserve tenancy
Case Study
The Landlord's L4 application was properly filed, even though it was received by the Board after the 30-day period, as it was reasonable to assume it would be delivered before the deadline. The parties had previously entered into a mediated agreement, and the Landlord was found to have lawfully increased the rent by the guideline amount. The Tenant agreed to pay the increase to preserve the tenancy.
Decision Summary
The previous order CEL-97058-20 was cancelled and replaced. The Tenant is ordered to pay the Landlord $528.00, representing 12 months of the rent increase for the period May 2020 through April 2021, on or before April 6, 2021. If the Tenant fails to make the payment, the tenancy is terminated on April 7, 2021, and the Tenant must vacate the rental unit. If the Tenant pays the $528.00 on or before April 6, 2021, the eviction order is void.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
775
Landlord Favorable
77.2%
Tenant Favorable
10.3%
Mutual Agreement
12.5%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$2,000
Rent Arrears
$528
Total Owing
$528 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.