Escobar v Pillai

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Share:

Order

Ordered by Jitewa Edu,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: March 9, 2022
Unit ***, 714 Grandview Drive, Oshawa, ON L1G7B3
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Personal use (N12)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Escobar v Pillai, 2022 CanLII 137669 (ON LTB)

File Number: TET-15379-21-RV

Timeline

Tenancy End Date

May 2020

22 months

Hearing Date

Feb 2022

14 days

Order Date

Mar 9, 2022

Decision

The Landlord's request to review the original order was granted. The Tenant's application alleging bad faith eviction was dismissed as the evidence did not support the assertion that the Landlord acted in bad faith when issuing the N12 notice.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenant filed an application alleging that Landlord gave a notice of termination in bad faith. Landlord requested a review of the original order, claiming they were unable to participate in the initial proceeding. The review was granted, and the original order was set aside. The Landlord's sale of the property and the purchaser's requirement for vacant possession were found to be in good faith, leading to the dismissal of the Tenant's application.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord believed purchaser intended to move in when serving N12 notice
  • Landlord was not reasonably able to participate in the original proceeding
  • No evidence of bad faith on Landlord's part
  • Original order contained a serious error
  • Purchaser did not occupy the rental unit
  • Tenant moved out due to N12 notice
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord argued that at the time of serving the N12 notice, they believed the purchaser intended to occupy the unit, and only learned later that the purchaser's plans had changed due to the pandemic.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord sold the unit due to being behind on mortgage payments. Landlord signed an Agreement of Purchase and Sale on February 25, 2020, which included a requirement for vacant possession.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant argued that the Landlord gave the N12 notice in bad faith, as the purchaser did not move in and the unit was re-rented at a higher price.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant moved out on May 3, 2020, due to the N12 notice. Tenant found an advertisement listing the rental unit for rent online on December 20, 2020.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Loading similar cases...
Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform