DK v MH

Last updated: July 30, 2024

Order

Ordered by ,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: February 26, 2016
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Tenant rights (N5)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: DK v MH, 2016 CanLII 44348

File Number: SWL-83510-15

Timeline

Hearing Date

Feb 2016

2 days

Order Date

Feb 26, 2016

Decision

The Landlord's application for eviction is denied on the condition that the Tenant removes the car shelter tent and all related items from the parking lot by March 2, 2016, and refrains from reinstalling it. The Tenant is ordered to pay $170.00 for the cost of filing the application. If the Tenant fails to comply with the conditions, the Landlord may apply for an order terminating the tenancy within 30 days of the breach.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment or lawful right of the Landlord or another tenant. The dispute centered around a car shelter tent the Tenant installed in the parking lot, which the Landlord claimed was causing issues with parking, snow removal, and safety.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Notice of Termination (N5) was properly served
  • Tenant's car shelter tent substantially interfered with Landlord's and other tenants' reasonable enjoyment
  • Tenant failed to remove tent as agreed
  • Tenant entitled to one parking space under tenancy agreement
  • Landlord has right to return to strict terms of tenancy agreement
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord argued that the tent's presence substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the property by reducing parking spaces and impeding snow removal.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord initially allowed the tent temporarily as a favor to the Tenant but later asked for its removal before winter for snow removal purposes.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant argued that he should not have to remove the tent and claimed he did not receive the Notice of Termination.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant installed a car shelter tent in the parking lot, refused to remove it when asked, and claimed he needed it for 'weekly maintenance' on his vehicle. Tenant also ran an extension cord across the parking lot to the tent.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Loading similar cases...
Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform