Simplify rentals with instant tenant verification
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
191 Cedar Street, Crystal Lake, ON N5A6S6
Decision in favor of
tenant
Balance Owed
-
Agree with the ruling?
Application Date
Jan 2020
Hearing Date
Nov 2021
Order Date
Jan 31, 2022
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to Tenant installing a fire pit and a large crushed stone patio area over the drainage lines, which substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant.
The Tenant did not have prior written approval from the Landlord to install the pea stones, as required by the lease agreement. The Tenant's evidence that she received verbal permission from the Landlord's maintenance manager was not sufficient to prove she had permission. The installation of the pea stones over the weeping bed interfered with the proper functioning of the septic system, which substantially interfered with other tenants' reasonable enjoyment and the Landlord's obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act. However, the Tribunal found it would not be unfair to grant relief from eviction subject to the Tenant removing the pea stones and replacing them with topsoil and sod by April 30, 2022.
Landlord's maintenance manager confirmed he only gave verbal permission to install the fire pit and armoured stone, not the pea stones.
Tenant argued she obtained verbal permission from Landlord's maintenance manager to install the items.
Tenant installed fire pit and 8x8 patio area made of "sand and very fine layer of pea stones" without prior written approval from Landlord.
The Landlord's application for eviction of the Tenant is denied on the condition that the Tenant removes the pea stones from the patio area and replaces it with topsoil and sod by April 30, 2022. If the Tenant fails to comply, the Landlord may apply for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant.
LTB Member
891
92.1%
5.4%
2.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Click to switch between case outcomes
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.