Crozier v Robinson: Personal Use Eviction in Sundridge, ON
Personal Use Eviction Case: Crozier v Robinson in Sundridge, ON
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
Case Summary
344 Brookside Road, Sundridge, ON P0A1Z0
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Dec 2021
Order Date
Mar 7, 2022
Tenancy End Date
Mar 2022
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants because the Landlords require possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation. The Tenants have lived in the unit for 9 years and have been unable to find a new place. The Landlord's child intends to move in with his family and is currently living in a trailer with his parents.
Determinations
- Landlord's child and family currently living in a trailer
- Landlords paid compensation equal to one month's rent on August 26, 2021
- Landlords require possession in good faith for residential occupation
- Postponing eviction until March 31, 2022, is not unfair
- Tenants are a family of four and have lived in the unit for 9 years
- Tenants have known for months about Landlord's intention to occupy
Case Study
The Landlord and Tenant Board found that the Landlords in good faith require possession of the rental unit for residential occupation. The Board considered the circumstances of both parties and determined that postponing the eviction until March 31, 2022, would not be unfair, balancing the interests of both parties.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Arguments
Landlords argued for possession of the rental unit for residential occupation by their child and his family.
Actions
Landlords paid the Tenants compensation equal to one month's rent on August 26, 2021. Landlord's child and family are currently living in a trailer with his parents.
Tenant
Arguments
Tenants argued for more time to find alternative housing due to their long-term tenancy and family situation.
Actions
Tenants have lived in the rental unit for 9 years and have been unable to find a new place.
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated as of March 31, 2022. The Tenants must move out by this date. If the unit is not vacated by March 31, 2022, the Landlords may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) for eviction enforcement starting April 1, 2022. The eviction order expires on October 1, 2022, if not filed with the Sheriff before that date.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
360
Landlord Favorable
95.3%
Tenant Favorable
4.2%
Mutual Agreement
0.6%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.