Landlords and Tenant Reach Agreement on Rent Arrears in Windsor: Covello v Rusan 2023
Landlords and tenant reach agreement on $8186 in rent arrears in Windsor rental dispute
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
894 Bridge Ave, Windsor, ON N9B2M8
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed to Landlord
$8,186
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Mar 2023
Order Date
Mar 13, 2023
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the Tenant did not void by paying the arrears.
Determinations
- Landlords served valid N4 Notice
- Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
- Lawful rent due on 1st of each month
- No payments made since application filed
Decision Summary
The parties consented to the following order: 1) Tenant shall pay Landlord $8,186.00 for rent arrears up to March 31, 2023 and costs, in monthly installments of $700.00 from March 15, 2023 to January 15, 2024, with a final payment of $486.00 on February 15, 2024. 2) Tenant shall also pay new rent on time and in full as it comes due from April 1, 2023 to February 1, 2024, or until the arrears are paid in full, whichever is earlier. 3) If Tenant fails to make any one of the payments, the outstanding balance shall become immediately due and owing, and Landlord may apply to LTB for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
687
Landlord Favorable
85.4%
Tenant Favorable
10.6%
Mutual Agreement
3.9%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Rent Arrears
$8,186
Total Owing
$8,186 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.