Cityhousing Hamilton Corporation v McGillivray

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Order

Ordered by Greg Brocanier,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: February 24, 2022
*** Upper Paradise Road, Hamilton, ON L9C5P9
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

$6,652

to Landlord

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionModerate

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Cityhousing Hamilton Corporation v McGillivray, 2022 CanLII 128482 (ON LTB)

File Number: SOL-25642-21

Timeline

Application Date

Nov 2021

4 months

Hearing Date

Feb 2022

9 days

Order Date

Feb 24, 2022

19 days

Tenancy End Date

Mar 2022

Decision

The tenancy is terminated effective March 15, 2022. The Tenant must move out by this date, unless the Tenant pays $1,336 by February 28, 2022 or $2,506 by March 15, 2022 to void the order and continue the tenancy. The Landlord is authorized to offset compensation for the Tenant's continued occupation and the application filing fee from the rent deposit owed to the Tenant.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the tenant did not void by paying the arrears.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Interest owed to Tenant on rent deposit from January 1, 2021 to September 1, 2021
  • Landlord holds $1,158.58 rent deposit
  • Landlord served valid N4 Notice
  • Rent increased to $1,170 on November 1, 2021 due to parking spot addition
  • Tenant has not paid rent from August 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022
  • Tenant in possession of rental unit
  • Tenant paid $5,830 after application filed
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Tenant's Arguments

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Lawful Rent

$1,170

Rent Arrears

$6,980

Application Fee

$186

Rent Deposit

$1,159

Deposit Interest

$1

Ordered Amount

$6,652 (to Landlord)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: