Landlord and Tenant Reach Agreement on Water Bill Dispute: Chen v Beardsworth, Hynes 2021
Landlord and tenants reach agreement on outstanding water bill in LTB consent order
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
29 Grove Hill Drive, Scarborough, ON M1T3E1
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed to Landlord
$782
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Jun 2021
Order Date
Jul 7, 2021
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord. The parties reached a settlement and agreed to a Consent Order to resolve the Landlord's application.
Determinations
- Tenants in possession of rental unit
- Tenants owe $782.48 for outstanding water and sewer charges
- Tenants to make installment payments to pay off charges
- Tenants to pay future water and sewer bills within 7 days of due date
- Landlord may apply for eviction order if Tenants fail to comply
Decision Summary
The parties reached a settlement and agreed to a Consent Order. The Tenants are ordered to pay the Landlord $782.48 for outstanding water and sewer charges in installments. The Tenants must also pay future water and sewer bills within 7 days of the due date. If the Tenants fail to comply, the Landlord may apply for an eviction order.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
8
Landlord Favorable
25.0%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
75.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Other Owed Amount
$782
Outstanding water and sewer charges
Total Owing
$782 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.