Bumra v Newman

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Order

Ordered by Douglas Wilkins,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: February 14, 2022
Unit ***, 579 Albert Street, Waterloo, ON N2L0G7
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

-

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Bumra v Newman, 2022 CanLII 106748 (ON LTB)

File Number: HOL-11966-21-RV

Timeline

Hearing Date

Jan 2022

1 months

Order Date

Feb 14, 2022

Decision

The request to review the order HOL-11966-21 issued on January 14, 2022 is denied. The order is confirmed and remains unchanged.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after the subtenancy agreement ended on August 31, 2021, and the Tenants did not vacate the rental unit by December 15, 2021, the date of the hearing.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord has a tenancy agreement with Accomud8, and Tenants are subletters
  • Landlord presented a payment plan for the arrears to the Tenants
  • Parties entered into a subtenancy agreement ending August 31, 2021
  • Significant rent arrears
  • Tenants did not vacate the rental unit by December 15, 2021
  • Tenants made no payments after Landlord filed the application
  • Tenants' refusal to vacate and pay rent caused prejudice to the Landlord
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Landlord presented a payment plan for the arrears to the Tenants.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenants claim the Landlord has no intention of moving back into the rental unit and that Accomud8 was willing to do a lease takeover but is now refusing.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenants did not vacate the rental unit by December 15, 2021, the date of the hearing.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: