Landlord and Tenant Reach Consent Agreement: 811970 Ontario Limited v Deprato
Landlord and tenant reach consent agreement for demolition of rental unit in Milton
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
8240 Britannia Rd, Milton, ON L9E 0J2
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed
$0
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Apr 2023
Order Date
Apr 26, 2023
Tenancy End Date
May 2023
Dispute Summary
The landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant because the landlord requires possession of the rental unit in order to demolish the unit. The parties engaged in settlement discussions and mutually agreed to resolve all matters at issue in the application.
Determinations
- Landlord requires possession for demolition
- Parties reached consent agreement
- Tenant must vacate by May 31, 2023
- Landlord to pay tenant $3,075
Case Study
The parties reached a consent agreement to resolve the matter. The landlord will pay the tenant $3,075 and the tenant must vacate the unit by May 31, 2023. If the unit is not vacated by that date, the landlord may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office for enforcement.
Decision Summary
The parties reached a consent agreement. The landlord will pay the tenant $3,075 and the tenant must vacate the unit by May 31, 2023. If the unit is not vacated by that date, the landlord may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office for enforcement.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
11
Landlord Favorable
36.4%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
63.6%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Rent Deposit
$3,075
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.