2759953 Ontario Inc. v Vautour

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Order

Ordered by Elle Venhola,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: March 3, 2022
Unit ***, 75 Elm Street, St Thomas, ON N5R1H7
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Renovation (N13)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: 2759953 Ontario Inc. v Vautour, 2022 CanLII 137343 (ON LTB)

File Number: SWL-49698-21

Timeline

Application Date

Mar 2021

5 months

Hearing Date

Aug 2021

7 months

Order Date

Mar 3, 2022

28 days

Tenancy End Date

Mar 2022

Decision

The Landlord's application to terminate tenancy for renovations was granted. The tenancy is terminated as of March 31, 2022. The Tenant must pay $5,420.64 for use of the unit from June 1, 2021 to March 3, 2022, plus $19.64 per day until move-out. The Tenant has the right of first refusal to reoccupy the unit after renovations.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied to terminate tenancy and evict Tenant for major repairs or renovations requiring vacant possession. Landlord served N13 Notice on January 27, 2021, with termination date of May 31, 2021. Tenant contested the application.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Building permit is required and obtained
  • Landlord has good faith intent to carry out renovations
  • Landlord requires vacant possession for major repairs/renovations
  • Renovations include updating electrical and plumbing systems
  • Tenant has right of first refusal to reoccupy unit after renovations
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord argues repairs and renovations are necessary for safety and legal compliance.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord has already commenced renovations on several other units in the complex.

Unlock Order Content

Procedural Errors

Landlord's witness was ill-prepared and not always forthcoming in testimony. Evidence presentation had significant gaps.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant's representative argued that the N13 Notice lacked sufficient detail required by law.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant reported electrical issues when using toaster and microwave simultaneously. Tenant is willing to move out temporarily for 'dangerous work' to be done.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Loading similar cases...
Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform