Last updated: September 12, 2024
Ordered by Donna Adams,Tribunals Ontario under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Previous Order
Upheld
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: 2350117 ONTARIO INC v Gratton, 2024 ONLTB 32324
File Number: LTB-L-065920-22-RV
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Feb 2024
Order Date
May 3, 2024
The request to review the previous order is denied. The previous order is confirmed and remains unchanged. The interim order staying the previous order is cancelled, and the stay is lifted on May 14, 2024.
The landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant because the tenant, another occupant, or someone the tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the landlord or another tenant, and has wilfully or negligently caused damage to the premises. The landlord also claimed compensation for each day the tenant remained in the unit after the termination date and for the cost to repair or replace the damage.
Landlord testified there are no ongoing issues with the community mailbox or the tenant's mailbox, and that he promptly attends to any maintenance issues reported. Landlord testified the tenant's animals have been cared for by the superintendent since the tenant was evicted, and the tenant has been given access to retrieve her belongings and animals.
Tenant alleges the landlord gave false testimony at the previous hearing and that the Board erred in making an order in the landlord's favor.
Tenant claims mailbox was broken, leaving mail accessible to others, and that mailman left a note to the property manager advising they could not access the property to leave mail around the time she was evicted. Tenant acknowledged receipt of the order issued December 8, 2023, which she received on December 23, 2023. Tenant was evicted by the sheriff on January 9, 2024 and left her dog and cat behind, which were not fed for many days.
Need assistance from an expert?
Click to switch between order outcomes
Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.
LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.
Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.
Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.
Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.
LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.
Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.
Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.
Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.
LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.
Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.
Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.
Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.
LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.
Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.
Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.
LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $8,050 in rent, ordered to pay $7,674.86.
Belleville tenants face eviction for landlord's personal use, given until April 2025 to vacate.
LTB denies tenant's motion to set aside eviction order due to failure to comply with pest control requirements.