111 Whitburn Holdings Ltd v Joel Dean Jude Constance

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Order

Ordered by Sonia Anwar-Ali,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: February 14, 2022
Unit ***, 111 Whitburn Crescent, Toronto, ON M3M2S6
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: 111 Whitburn Holdings Ltd v Joel Dean Jude Constance, 2022 CanLII 118676 (ON LTB)

File Number: TNL-35809-21-SA

Timeline

Application Date (Estimate)

Oct 2021

4 months

Hearing Date

Feb 2022

11 days

Order Date

Feb 14, 2022

4 days

Tenancy End Date

Feb 2022

We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.

Decision

The motion to set aside the eviction order is denied. The stay of the eviction order is lifted on February 18, 2022. The Board found that the tenant's ongoing defaults were not reasonable and that the tenant could not afford the rental unit.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the tenant did not void by paying the arrears. The tenant had not vacated the rental unit prior to the hearing date.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Arrears have almost doubled since original hearing date
  • Tenant began working again in late November 2021 but continued to breach order
  • Tenant breached consent order by failing to pay November 2021 rent on time
  • Tenant cannot afford the rental unit
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord opposed the tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order and submitted that the motion be denied and the stay be lifted immediately, as further arrears had accrued and the tenancy was unaffordable for the tenant.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant sought to preserve the tenancy and proposed a repayment plan, and alternatively sought 6 months to secure alternative housing.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant lost his job 4 days after the October 2021 hearing, which led to the breach of the consent order. Tenant began working again in late November 2021 but continued to breach the order until making a payment right before the February 2022 hearing.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

MA v MACHADO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
North York

Landlord granted eviction for $22,341 in arrears, but LTB delays move-out date due to tenant's recent heart surgery.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Nan v Christie

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Markham

Markham tenants granted a chance to stay in their home by paying over $13,000 in arrears under a consent agreement.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

MA v MACHADO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
North York

Landlord granted eviction for $22,341 in arrears, but LTB delays move-out date due to tenant's recent heart surgery.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Nan v Christie

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Markham

Markham tenants granted a chance to stay in their home by paying over $13,000 in arrears under a consent agreement.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform