RentZen Logo

Stephen Rotstein

Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions

Overview

Total Orders

5

Orders since 2024

5

Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant since 2024

2

Landlord's Notice Found Invalid since 2024

0

Hearing to Order
16days
Order to Termination
11days

Order Outcomes
PRO

Contested disputes are those where both parties were present at the hearing

PRO
Landlord Wins
30 orders60%
Tenant Wins
30 orders30%
Agreement
30 orders10%

Subscribe to view detailed win rates

Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 2 Orders since 2024
PRO

NIAGARARENTAL.CA v Bernard

Reason for Relief

The Tenant is a single mother with a teenage child, is currently unemployed but has a job offer and has applied for OSAP. Granting an extended eviction period would allow the Tenant to find alternative accommodation or improve their financial situation.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord
Find More with Pro Search

Unlock Full Access to Stephen Rotstein's Decisions

Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

Gain insights on how Stephen Rotstein typically rules on cases like yours

Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 0 Orders since 2024
PRO

Find More with Pro Search

Contested Dispute by Category
PRO

    • Substantial Interference1

      Landlord Win Rate: 0%

    Unlock Full Access to Stephen Rotstein's Decisions

    Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

    Gain insights on how Stephen Rotstein typically rules on cases like yours

    Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

    Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

    Latest Orders

    PRO

    Singh v Wimalanath

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    April 19, 2024
    Brampton

    Brampton tenants face eviction for persistent late payment, owe $10,910.33 to landlord.

    Tenant Aggravating Factor
    ContentionHigh
    0
    0
    Read more

    2290895 ONTARIO INC v Farrell

    Contested Dispute
    Agreement
    April 18, 2024
    Collingwood

    Landlord granted conditional relief from evicting Collingwood tenant over unsafe washer and dryer installation.

    Testimony Contested
    Eviction Relief Granted
    ContentionHigh
    0
    0
    Read more

    COLE v HUANG

    Contested Dispute
    Tenant Wins
    March 28, 2024
    Barrie

    Barrie tenants awarded $11,708.99 after landlords served N12 notices in bad faith.

    ContentionHigh
    0
    0
    Read more

    NIAGARARENTAL.CA v Bernard

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    January 23, 2024
    Niagara Falls

    Niagara Falls tenant ordered to pay $10,409.06 or face eviction for non-payment of rent.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    ContentionModerate
    0
    0
    Read more

    Ottawa Community Housing v Ghiader

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    January 22, 2024
    Ottawa

    Ottawa tenants evicted for non-payment of rent, owe $6,399 to landlord.

    ContentionModerate
    0
    0
    Read more

    Unlock Full Access to Stephen Rotstein's Decisions

    Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

    Gain insights on how Stephen Rotstein typically rules on cases like yours

    Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

    Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument