Fabio Quattrociocchi
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
923
380
76
16
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 76 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Fabio Quattrociocchi's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Fabio Quattrociocchi typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 16 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Fabio Quattrociocchi's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Fabio Quattrociocchi typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Maintenance Issues39
Landlord Win Rate: 28.21%
- Tenant Agreed Termination37
Landlord Win Rate: 35.14%
- Property Damage34
Landlord Win Rate: 38.24%
- Personal Use33
Landlord Win Rate: 51.52%
- Harassment27
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Other25
Landlord Win Rate: 40%
Unlock Full Access to Fabio Quattrociocchi's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Fabio Quattrociocchi typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Wu v 1789331 Ontario Ltd
The parties reached a consent order to terminate the tenancy effective the date the Tenant vacated the rental unit.
The Tenant's application claiming illegal rent increases was dismissed because they had paid the increased rent for over 12 months, validating the increases under the RTA.
The Tenant's application regarding harassment and interference was dismissed due to their failure to attend the hearing.
Stepniak v Franzo
The Tenant's application regarding harassment and interference was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's application regarding illegal rent retention was dismissed due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing.
Fournier and Kukkonen v Interrent Holdings Manager Limited Partnership
The Tenants withdrew their application regarding illegal collection or retention of money at the hearing.
Wu v 1789331 Ontario Ltd
The parties reached a consent order to terminate the tenancy effective the date the Tenant vacated the rental unit.
The Tenant's application claiming illegal rent increases was dismissed because they had paid the increased rent for over 12 months, validating the increases under the RTA.
The Tenant's application regarding harassment and interference was dismissed due to their failure to attend the hearing.
Stepniak v Franzo
The Tenant's application regarding harassment and interference was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's application regarding illegal rent retention was dismissed due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing.
Fournier and Kukkonen v Interrent Holdings Manager Limited Partnership
The Tenants withdrew their application regarding illegal collection or retention of money at the hearing.
Wu v 1789331 Ontario Ltd
The parties reached a consent order to terminate the tenancy effective the date the Tenant vacated the rental unit.
The Tenant's application claiming illegal rent increases was dismissed because they had paid the increased rent for over 12 months, validating the increases under the RTA.
The Tenant's application regarding harassment and interference was dismissed due to their failure to attend the hearing.
Stepniak v Franzo
The Tenant's application regarding harassment and interference was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's application regarding illegal rent retention was dismissed due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing.
Fournier and Kukkonen v Interrent Holdings Manager Limited Partnership
The Tenants withdrew their application regarding illegal collection or retention of money at the hearing.
Wu v 1789331 Ontario Ltd
The parties reached a consent order to terminate the tenancy effective the date the Tenant vacated the rental unit.
The Tenant's application claiming illegal rent increases was dismissed because they had paid the increased rent for over 12 months, validating the increases under the RTA.
The Tenant's application regarding harassment and interference was dismissed due to their failure to attend the hearing.
Stepniak v Franzo
The Tenant's application regarding harassment and interference was dismissed after they failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's application regarding illegal rent retention was dismissed due to the Tenant's failure to attend the hearing.
Fournier and Kukkonen v Interrent Holdings Manager Limited Partnership
The Tenants withdrew their application regarding illegal collection or retention of money at the hearing.
Unlock Full Access to Fabio Quattrociocchi's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Fabio Quattrociocchi typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The LTB Hearing Process: What to Expect and How to Prepare for Success
A comprehensive guide to navigating Landlord and Tenant Board hearings in Ontario, including preparation tips, procedural requirements, and common pitfalls to avoid.
Short-Term Rentals and the LTB: When Airbnb Meets Ontario's Rental Laws
Navigate the complex intersection of short-term rentals, municipal bylaws, and Ontario's Residential Tenancies Act. Learn when the LTB has jurisdiction, how Airbnb affects tenancy rights, and what landlords and tenants need to know about this evolving legal landscape.
The Hidden Cost of Renting: Illegal Application Fees and Screening Charges in Ontario's Rental Market
An in-depth analysis of illegal rental application fees, screening charges, and tenant selection abuses reveals how landlords exploit prospective tenants through prohibited charges and discriminatory practices, plus the substantial penalties they face.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform