Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Member Past Decisions
51
46
7
0
Showing most recent decisions
Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $16,186 in rent.
Aurora tenant faces eviction for $89,800 in rent arrears and interfering with landlord, ordered to pay $35,186.
Milton tenant faces eviction for $29,200 in rent arrears, ordered to pay $26,086.56 to landlord.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for non-payment of rent, owes $2,398.35 to landlord.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for non-payment of rent, owes $2,398.35 to landlord.
Milton tenant faces eviction for $29,200 in rent arrears, ordered to pay $26,086.56 to landlord.
Aurora tenant faces eviction for $89,800 in rent arrears and interfering with landlord, ordered to pay $35,186.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $16,186 in rent.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for non-payment of rent, owes $2,398.35 to landlord.
Milton tenant faces eviction for $29,200 in rent arrears, ordered to pay $26,086.56 to landlord.
Aurora tenant faces eviction for $89,800 in rent arrears and interfering with landlord, ordered to pay $35,186.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $16,186 in rent.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for non-payment of rent, owes $2,398.35 to landlord.
Milton tenant faces eviction for $29,200 in rent arrears, ordered to pay $26,086.56 to landlord.
Aurora tenant faces eviction for $89,800 in rent arrears and interfering with landlord, ordered to pay $35,186.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $16,186 in rent.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $16,186 in rent.
Aurora tenant faces eviction for $89,800 in rent arrears and interfering with landlord, ordered to pay $35,186.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for non-payment of rent, owes $2,398.35 to landlord.
Milton tenant faces eviction for $29,200 in rent arrears, ordered to pay $26,086.56 to landlord.
Aurora tenant faces eviction for $89,800 in rent arrears and interfering with landlord, ordered to pay $35,186.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $16,186 in rent.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $16,186 in rent.
Aurora tenant faces eviction for $89,800 in rent arrears and interfering with landlord, ordered to pay $35,186.
Milton tenant faces eviction for $29,200 in rent arrears, ordered to pay $26,086.56 to landlord.
Scarborough tenant faces eviction for non-payment of rent, owes $2,398.35 to landlord.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Charles Dowdall typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Charles Dowdall typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Charles Dowdall typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument