Benjamin Seigel
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
530
530
105
16
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 105 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 16 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Tenant Agreed Termination24
Landlord Win Rate: 58.33%
- Tenant Rights21
Landlord Win Rate: 38.1%
- Personal Use20
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
- Property Damage18
Landlord Win Rate: 55.56%
- Bad Faith Eviction15
Landlord Win Rate: 13.33%
- Maintenance Issues15
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Liang v Li
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review a personal use eviction order, ruling that the tenant's arguments should have been raised at the original hearing and that clerical errors had already been corrected.
Renaissance Property Management v Satorre
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order because the request failed to establish any serious error in the proceedings or original order.
Centurion Property Associates Inc. v Mendonca
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of an eviction order for non-payment of rent because the tenant's failure to attend the original hearing based on a mistaken belief of cancellation did not meet the regulatory requirements for review.
Golwala v Widz
The LTB denied the tenant's second request to review a review order pursuant to Rule 26.18.
Merkur Properties v Naseer
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's request for a review of an eviction order because the tenant's stated reason did not qualify under the prescribed regulatory limits for review powers.
Equiton Living v Amarkhail
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of a consent order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating an inability to participate in the original hearing.
Liang v Li
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review a personal use eviction order, ruling that the tenant's arguments should have been raised at the original hearing and that clerical errors had already been corrected.
Renaissance Property Management v Satorre
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order because the request failed to establish any serious error in the proceedings or original order.
Centurion Property Associates Inc. v Mendonca
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of an eviction order for non-payment of rent because the tenant's failure to attend the original hearing based on a mistaken belief of cancellation did not meet the regulatory requirements for review.
Golwala v Widz
The LTB denied the tenant's second request to review a review order pursuant to Rule 26.18.
Merkur Properties v Naseer
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's request for a review of an eviction order because the tenant's stated reason did not qualify under the prescribed regulatory limits for review powers.
Equiton Living v Amarkhail
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of a consent order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating an inability to participate in the original hearing.
Liang v Li
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review a personal use eviction order, ruling that the tenant's arguments should have been raised at the original hearing and that clerical errors had already been corrected.
Renaissance Property Management v Satorre
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order because the request failed to establish any serious error in the proceedings or original order.
Centurion Property Associates Inc. v Mendonca
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of an eviction order for non-payment of rent because the tenant's failure to attend the original hearing based on a mistaken belief of cancellation did not meet the regulatory requirements for review.
Golwala v Widz
The LTB denied the tenant's second request to review a review order pursuant to Rule 26.18.
Merkur Properties v Naseer
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's request for a review of an eviction order because the tenant's stated reason did not qualify under the prescribed regulatory limits for review powers.
Equiton Living v Amarkhail
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of a consent order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating an inability to participate in the original hearing.
Liang v Li
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review a personal use eviction order, ruling that the tenant's arguments should have been raised at the original hearing and that clerical errors had already been corrected.
Renaissance Property Management v Satorre
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order because the request failed to establish any serious error in the proceedings or original order.
Centurion Property Associates Inc. v Mendonca
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of an eviction order for non-payment of rent because the tenant's failure to attend the original hearing based on a mistaken belief of cancellation did not meet the regulatory requirements for review.
Golwala v Widz
The LTB denied the tenant's second request to review a review order pursuant to Rule 26.18.
Merkur Properties v Naseer
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's request for a review of an eviction order because the tenant's stated reason did not qualify under the prescribed regulatory limits for review powers.
Equiton Living v Amarkhail
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of a consent order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating an inability to participate in the original hearing.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The Paralegal Advantage: When Professional Representation Makes the Difference at the LTB
Discover how professional legal representation can dramatically improve your chances of success at the Landlord and Tenant Board. Learn when to hire a paralegal, what they bring to your case, and real examples of how representation changes outcomes.
Common Reasons Landlords Lose at the LTB (And How to Avoid Them)
Learn from real LTB cases why landlord applications fail. Discover the most common mistakes that lead to dismissed applications and practical strategies to strengthen your case and protect your investment.
Conditional Orders and Payment Plans: When the LTB Gives Tenants a Second Chance
Explore how conditional orders and payment plans work at Ontario's LTB, examining real cases where tenants avoided eviction and the factors that influence these crucial second chances.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform