Benjamin Seigel
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
359
359
72
13
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 72 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 13 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Personal Use20
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
- Tenant Rights15
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Bad Faith Eviction14
Landlord Win Rate: 14.29%
- Property Damage14
Landlord Win Rate: 64.29%
- Tenant Agreed Termination12
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
- Maintenance Issues10
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Ahmadian v S**** Cheema
The Tenant was awarded $27,688.00 after successfully proving that the Purchaser served an N12 notice in bad faith.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's request to review an eviction order issued for personal use, concluding that the original hearing was conducted fairly.
Hossain v Dwyer
The Board denied the Tenant's second request to review a previous order, confirming the order remains unchanged.
Hossain v Dwyer
The LTB denied a tenant's request for a review of an eviction order, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence that they were unable to attend the original hearing.
177 Jameson Avenue Limited c/o Minto Management Limited v Humphrey
The Board denied the Tenant's request to review an eviction order, finding no serious error in the original determination that changing locks and failing to provide keys constituted substantial interference.
The Tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied because the Tenant failed to demonstrate they were unable to attend the original hearing.
Ahmadian v S**** Cheema
The Tenant was awarded $27,688.00 after successfully proving that the Purchaser served an N12 notice in bad faith.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's request to review an eviction order issued for personal use, concluding that the original hearing was conducted fairly.
Hossain v Dwyer
The Board denied the Tenant's second request to review a previous order, confirming the order remains unchanged.
Hossain v Dwyer
The LTB denied a tenant's request for a review of an eviction order, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence that they were unable to attend the original hearing.
177 Jameson Avenue Limited c/o Minto Management Limited v Humphrey
The Board denied the Tenant's request to review an eviction order, finding no serious error in the original determination that changing locks and failing to provide keys constituted substantial interference.
The Tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied because the Tenant failed to demonstrate they were unable to attend the original hearing.
Ahmadian v S**** Cheema
The Tenant was awarded $27,688.00 after successfully proving that the Purchaser served an N12 notice in bad faith.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's request to review an eviction order issued for personal use, concluding that the original hearing was conducted fairly.
Hossain v Dwyer
The Board denied the Tenant's second request to review a previous order, confirming the order remains unchanged.
Hossain v Dwyer
The LTB denied a tenant's request for a review of an eviction order, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence that they were unable to attend the original hearing.
177 Jameson Avenue Limited c/o Minto Management Limited v Humphrey
The Board denied the Tenant's request to review an eviction order, finding no serious error in the original determination that changing locks and failing to provide keys constituted substantial interference.
The Tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied because the Tenant failed to demonstrate they were unable to attend the original hearing.
Ahmadian v S**** Cheema
The Tenant was awarded $27,688.00 after successfully proving that the Purchaser served an N12 notice in bad faith.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's request to review an eviction order issued for personal use, concluding that the original hearing was conducted fairly.
Hossain v Dwyer
The Board denied the Tenant's second request to review a previous order, confirming the order remains unchanged.
Hossain v Dwyer
The LTB denied a tenant's request for a review of an eviction order, as the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence that they were unable to attend the original hearing.
177 Jameson Avenue Limited c/o Minto Management Limited v Humphrey
The Board denied the Tenant's request to review an eviction order, finding no serious error in the original determination that changing locks and failing to provide keys constituted substantial interference.
The Tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment of rent was denied because the Tenant failed to demonstrate they were unable to attend the original hearing.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The Appeal Process Decoded: When and How to Challenge LTB Decisions at the Divisional Court
Navigate the complex world of appealing Landlord and Tenant Board decisions to Ontario's Divisional Court. Learn the strict requirements, common pitfalls, and strategies for successful appeals.
LTB Review vs. Divisional Court Appeal in Ontario: Which Path Should You Take? (2026)
Lost at the Landlord and Tenant Board? Compare LTB internal review and Divisional Court appeal—deadlines, grounds, stays, Bill 60 changes, costs, and when to use each path before going to court.
How to Enforce an LTB Eviction Order in Ontario: Sheriff Process, Stays, and Lockout Day
Won at the LTB but the tenant won't leave? Learn how Ontario landlords enforce eviction orders through the Sheriff, what happens on lockout day, daily compensation rules, and how tenant stays can delay enforcement.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform