Benjamin Seigel
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
530
530
105
16
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 105 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 16 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Tenant Agreed Termination24
Landlord Win Rate: 58.33%
- Tenant Rights21
Landlord Win Rate: 38.1%
- Personal Use20
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
- Property Damage18
Landlord Win Rate: 55.56%
- Bad Faith Eviction15
Landlord Win Rate: 13.33%
- Maintenance Issues15
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Liang v Li
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review a personal use eviction order, ruling that the tenant's arguments should have been raised at the original hearing and that clerical errors had already been corrected.
Renaissance Property Management v Satorre
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order because the request failed to establish any serious error in the proceedings or original order.
Centurion Property Associates Inc. v Mendonca
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of an eviction order for non-payment of rent because the tenant's failure to attend the original hearing based on a mistaken belief of cancellation did not meet the regulatory requirements for review.
Golwala v Widz
The LTB denied the tenant's second request to review a review order pursuant to Rule 26.18.
Merkur Properties v Naseer
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's request for a review of an eviction order because the tenant's stated reason did not qualify under the prescribed regulatory limits for review powers.
Equiton Living v Amarkhail
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of a consent order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating an inability to participate in the original hearing.
Liang v Li
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review a personal use eviction order, ruling that the tenant's arguments should have been raised at the original hearing and that clerical errors had already been corrected.
Renaissance Property Management v Satorre
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order because the request failed to establish any serious error in the proceedings or original order.
Centurion Property Associates Inc. v Mendonca
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of an eviction order for non-payment of rent because the tenant's failure to attend the original hearing based on a mistaken belief of cancellation did not meet the regulatory requirements for review.
Golwala v Widz
The LTB denied the tenant's second request to review a review order pursuant to Rule 26.18.
Merkur Properties v Naseer
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's request for a review of an eviction order because the tenant's stated reason did not qualify under the prescribed regulatory limits for review powers.
Equiton Living v Amarkhail
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of a consent order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating an inability to participate in the original hearing.
Liang v Li
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review a personal use eviction order, ruling that the tenant's arguments should have been raised at the original hearing and that clerical errors had already been corrected.
Renaissance Property Management v Satorre
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order because the request failed to establish any serious error in the proceedings or original order.
Centurion Property Associates Inc. v Mendonca
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of an eviction order for non-payment of rent because the tenant's failure to attend the original hearing based on a mistaken belief of cancellation did not meet the regulatory requirements for review.
Golwala v Widz
The LTB denied the tenant's second request to review a review order pursuant to Rule 26.18.
Merkur Properties v Naseer
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's request for a review of an eviction order because the tenant's stated reason did not qualify under the prescribed regulatory limits for review powers.
Equiton Living v Amarkhail
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of a consent order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating an inability to participate in the original hearing.
Liang v Li
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review a personal use eviction order, ruling that the tenant's arguments should have been raised at the original hearing and that clerical errors had already been corrected.
Renaissance Property Management v Satorre
The LTB denied the tenant's request to review an eviction and arrears order because the request failed to establish any serious error in the proceedings or original order.
Centurion Property Associates Inc. v Mendonca
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of an eviction order for non-payment of rent because the tenant's failure to attend the original hearing based on a mistaken belief of cancellation did not meet the regulatory requirements for review.
Golwala v Widz
The LTB denied the tenant's second request to review a review order pursuant to Rule 26.18.
Merkur Properties v Naseer
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's request for a review of an eviction order because the tenant's stated reason did not qualify under the prescribed regulatory limits for review powers.
Equiton Living v Amarkhail
The LTB denied the tenant's review request of a consent order because the tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating an inability to participate in the original hearing.
Unlock Full Access to Benjamin Seigel's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Benjamin Seigel typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Tenant Harassment and Illegal Entry: Understanding Your Rights and Remedies Under Ontario Law
A comprehensive guide to tenant rights regarding harassment and illegal entry in Ontario, exploring what constitutes violations, how the LTB evaluates these claims, and the remedies available to protect tenants from landlord misconduct.
The N12 Eviction Maze: Understanding Personal Use and Purchaser Requirements in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to N12 notices for personal use and purchaser requirements, including compensation obligations, good faith requirements, and common pitfalls that lead to dismissed applications.
How to Fill Out the T6 Application: Ontario Tenant's Guide to Maintenance and Repair Claims at the LTB
Complete instructions for the LTB T6 tenant maintenance application in Ontario. Learn how to document disrepair, request rent abatements, claim out-of-pocket costs, and avoid common filing mistakes.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform