Amber Neumann
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Member Past Decisions
Overview
18
0
Who Wins
Contested Disputes Outcomes
Contested Dispute Categories
- Other4
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
- Property Damage2
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
- Bad Faith Eviction1
Landlord Win Rate: 0%
- Non Payment Of Rent1
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
- Personal Use1
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
- Substantial Interference1
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
Unlock Full Access to Amber Neumann's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Amber Neumann typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Showing most recent decisions
Le v Steeves
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case, tenant ordered to pay $9,119.61.
North 44 Properties v Smith
Landlord Wins Substantial Interference Case: North 44 Properties v Smith
Culina v Cudlipp
Sault Ste. Marie tenant evicted for landlord's personal use, ordered to vacate by January 3, 2023
Roshankar v Reid
Landlord awarded $12,446.79 in rent arrears, tenant ordered to vacate Mississauga rental unit.
Auburn Terraces Ltd. v McCrae
Scarborough tenants evicted for non-payment of rent, owe $5,822 to landlord
Chu v Wysocki
Kitchener tenant evicted for harassing and threatening another tenant, impacting safety
Tranter v Bartosh-Smith
Landlord Wins Damages and Eviction in Peterborough Tenant Dispute
Soper v. Doherty
Barrie rooming house tenant evicted for threats, property damage, and unsanitary conditions
Le v Steeves
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case, tenant ordered to pay $9,119.61.
North 44 Properties v Smith
Landlord Wins Substantial Interference Case: North 44 Properties v Smith
Culina v Cudlipp
Sault Ste. Marie tenant evicted for landlord's personal use, ordered to vacate by January 3, 2023
Roshankar v Reid
Landlord awarded $12,446.79 in rent arrears, tenant ordered to vacate Mississauga rental unit.
Le v Steeves
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case, tenant ordered to pay $9,119.61.
North 44 Properties v Smith
Landlord Wins Substantial Interference Case: North 44 Properties v Smith
Culina v Cudlipp
Sault Ste. Marie tenant evicted for landlord's personal use, ordered to vacate by January 3, 2023
Roshankar v Reid
Landlord awarded $12,446.79 in rent arrears, tenant ordered to vacate Mississauga rental unit.
Le v Steeves
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case, tenant ordered to pay $9,119.61.
North 44 Properties v Smith
Landlord Wins Substantial Interference Case: North 44 Properties v Smith
Culina v Cudlipp
Sault Ste. Marie tenant evicted for landlord's personal use, ordered to vacate by January 3, 2023
Roshankar v Reid
Landlord awarded $12,446.79 in rent arrears, tenant ordered to vacate Mississauga rental unit.
Auburn Terraces Ltd. v McCrae
Scarborough tenants evicted for non-payment of rent, owe $5,822 to landlord
Chu v Wysocki
Kitchener tenant evicted for harassing and threatening another tenant, impacting safety
Le v Steeves
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case, tenant ordered to pay $9,119.61.
North 44 Properties v Smith
Landlord Wins Substantial Interference Case: North 44 Properties v Smith
Culina v Cudlipp
Sault Ste. Marie tenant evicted for landlord's personal use, ordered to vacate by January 3, 2023
Roshankar v Reid
Landlord awarded $12,446.79 in rent arrears, tenant ordered to vacate Mississauga rental unit.
Auburn Terraces Ltd. v McCrae
Scarborough tenants evicted for non-payment of rent, owe $5,822 to landlord
Chu v Wysocki
Kitchener tenant evicted for harassing and threatening another tenant, impacting safety
Tranter v Bartosh-Smith
Landlord Wins Damages and Eviction in Peterborough Tenant Dispute
Soper v. Doherty
Barrie rooming house tenant evicted for threats, property damage, and unsanitary conditions
Unlock Full Access to Amber Neumann's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Amber Neumann typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument